Search for: All records

Abstract The marine oligotrich ciliate Strombidium capitatum is a cruise-feeder, relying on ciliary motion and propulsion flow to individually detect and capture particles. High-speed, high-magnification digital imaging revealed that the cell swims forward by sweeping its anterior adoral membranelles (AAMs) backward, achieving a mean path-averaged speed of U = 1.7 mm s−1 (31 cell-lengths per second). Particle detection occurs through either hydrodynamic signal perception or ciliary contact perception, with a mean reaction distance of R = 20.4 μm. While executing a ciliary reversal of AAMs to handle and capture a perceived particle, the cell coordinates the ciliary motion of ventral adoral membranelles (VAMs, the “lapel”) with the ciliary reversal of AAMs (the “collar”), causing a sudden halt of cell motion, thereby functioning as a motion “brake” that is crucial for effective particle capture. The encounter rate with small prey particles is calculated using πR2U (~8.0 μL h−1, equivalent to ~ 3.5 × 106 cell volumes per day). Based on hydrodynamic modeling results, it is hypothesized that spatial structures of the flow velocity vector and acceleration fields in front of the swimming cell are essential for pushing an embedded particle forward, creating a strong enough slip velocity and hydrodynamic signal for prey perception, even for a neutrally buoyant small particle. 

Abstract The marine tintinnid ciliate Amphorides quadrilineata is a feeding-current feeder, creating flows for particle encounter, capture and rejection. Individual-level behaviors were observed using high-speed, high-magnification digital imaging. Cells beat their cilia backward to swim forward, simultaneously generating a feeding current that brings in particles. These particles are then individually captured through localized ciliary reversals. When swimming backward, cells beat their cilia forward (=ciliary reversals involving the entire ring of cilia), actively rejecting unwanted particles. Cells achieve path-averaged speeds averaging 3–4 total lengths per second. Both micro-particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics were employed to characterize the cell-scale flows. Forward swimming generates a feeding current, a saddle flow vector field in front of the cell, whereas backward swimming creates an inverse saddle flow vector field behind the cell; these ciliary flows facilitate particle encounter, capture and rejection. The model-tintinnid with a full-length lorica achieves an encounter rate Q ~29% higher than that without a lorica, albeit at a ~142% increase in mechanical power and a decrease in quasi-propulsive efficiency (~0.24 vs. ~ 0.38). It is also suggested that Q can be approximated by π(W/2 + l)2U, where W, l and U represent the lorica oral diameter, ciliary length and swimming speed, respectively.